Summary:

—

### **1. SCOPE OF WORK (SPD RESPONSIBILITIES)**
– **End-to-End Development**: Design, supply, installation, commissioning, O&M for 25 years.
– **Civil & Structural Works**: Roof strengthening, permanent ladders, drainage, waterproofing.
– **Grid Connectivity**: Evacuation up to BHEL’s substation, including transformers, cables, metering infrastructure.
– **Safety & Monitoring**: CCTV, monkey protection, SCADA, weather monitoring, RFID tagging of modules.
– **Compliance**: All statutory clearances, permits, labor laws, GST, insurance.
– **Water & Auxiliary Power**: Water provided by BHEL at chargeable rates; auxiliary power drawn from grid and netted off.
– **Site Handover**: After 25 years, SPD must either remove plant or hand over in working condition to BHEL at no cost.

—

### **2. BIDDING PROCESS & ELIGIBILITY**
– **Bid System**: Single-stage, two-envelope (Techno-Commercial & Financial).
– **Eligible Entities**: Indian companies, consortia, foreign companies (must form Indian SPV with ≥51% holding). LLPs not eligible.
– **Pre-Qualification Criteria**:
– **Technical**: Minimum 500 KWp rooftop/land solar plant installed and operational for ≥1 year in last 7 years.
– **Financial**:
– Net Worth ≥ ₹133.64 Lakhs.
– Avg. Annual Turnover ≥ ₹267 Lakhs (last 3 years) OR Line of Credit ≥ ₹167 Lakhs.
– **Experience**: Must provide PO/work completion certificate.
– **EMD**: ₹5 Lakhs (valid 6 months).
– **Performance Bank Guarantee**: ₹33.8 Lakhs (₹20.8L for Jhansi, ₹13L for Varanasi) before PPA signing.

—

### **3. BID EVALUATION & SELECTION**
– **Techno-Commercial Evaluation**: Compliance with NIT, site visits, document verification.
– **Financial Bid**: Tariff quoted up to two decimals.
– **Reverse Auction**: E-auction for shortlisted bidders (BHEL may decide not to conduct).
– **Selection Criteria**: Lowest tariff (L1) selected; tie-breaker based on earlier bid timestamp.

—

### **4. KEY CONTRACTUAL & COMMERCIAL TERMS**
– **Tariff**: Fixed for 25 years, inclusive of all taxes (except future Change in Law).
– **Change in Law**: Compensation mechanism via Appropriate Commission; excludes corporate tax changes.
– **Capacity Utilization Factor (CUF)**: Minimum CUF as per Annexure-J (declining from 16.85% in Year 1 to 13.50% in Year 25).
– **Generation Shortfall**: SPD pays compensation = (DISCOM tariff – PPA tariff) × shortfall energy.
– **Excess Generation**: BHEL may purchase excess unless refused; SPD cannot sell to third parties without BHEL’s written consent.
– **Commissioning Timeline**: 6 months from PPA effective date.
– **Delay Penalties**:
– Up to 1 month: 20% PBG encashed.
– 1–3 months: Remaining 80% PBG encashed.
– Beyond 3 months: BHEL may terminate PPA.
– **Financial Closure**: Within 3 months of PPA; delay charges @ ₹1000/MW/day + GST.

—

### **5. LEGAL & STATUTORY HIGHLIGHTS**
– **GST Compliance**: Mandatory; invoices must match GSTR-2B for credit.
– **Statutory Duties**: PF, ESI, Bonus, Gratuity, Labour Welfare Fund, etc., as per BHEL norms.
– **Dispute Resolution**:
– First: Amicable settlement via BHEL’s Designated Engineer.
– Then: Conciliation as per BHEL Conciliation Scheme 2018.
– Arbitration: Through India International Arbitration Centre (IIAC), New Delhi (for disputes < ₹10 Cr).
– **Jurisdiction**: Exclusive courts in Jhansi/Varanasi.
– **Liability Cap**: Limited to contract price except for fraud, willful misconduct, or IP infringement.

—

### **6. DOCUMENTATION & FORMATS**
– **Mandatory Formats Provided**:
– Covering Letter, Power of Attorney, Financial Requirement, PBG, Board Resolutions, Consortium Agreement, Technology Declaration, No Deviation Certificate, etc.
– **Submission**: Online via GePNIC portal; digital signature required.

—

### **7. TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS**
– **Modules**: Must be from MNRE’s Approved List of Models & Manufacturers.
– **Warranty**: Modules – 90% output after 10 years, 80% after 25 years; Inverters – 5 years warranty.
– **Standards**: IEC/BIS compliance for modules, inverters, cables, connectors.
– **Monitoring**: SCADA, real-time data to BHEL, RFID tracking for modules.
– **Disposal**: E-waste rules compliance for end-of-life modules.

—

For more information please see below link:

HPCL issue Tender for Site Works for Solar Plant Installation

For more information please see below link:

Tender Details :

Tender Title	:	SITE WORKS FOR SOLAR PLANT INSTALLATION
Tender Reference Number	:	2500025102-HB-02891	Tender Type	:	Open/Advertised
Tender Category	:	Works	Product Category	:	Civil Works
Product Sub-Category	:		Tender Fee *	:	0
EMD *	:	0	Location	:	Ponda
* Currency regarding Fee/EMD/Tender Value may please be checked with the corresponding tender portals/websites.

Critical Dates :

ePublished Date	:	24-Jan-2026 10:00 AM	Bid Opening Date	:	06-Feb-2026 11:00 AM
Document Download Start Date	:	24-Jan-2026 10:00 AM	Document Download End Date	:	06-Feb-2026 11:00 AM
Bid Submission Start Date	:	24-Jan-2026 10:00 AM	Bid Submission End Date	:	06-Feb-2026 11:00 AM

Summary:

—

### **1. Project Overview**
* **Objective:** Select SPDs to finance, design, install, own, operate, and maintain rooftop solar plants. The SPD will sell the generated solar power to the client organization under a long-term Power Purchase Agreement (PPA).
* **Total Capacity:** ~5,665 kW, split across 14 projects at different client sites (e.g., Sushma Swaraj Bhawan, MEA, DGCA, NIFTs, IISERs, etc.).
* **Business Model:** **RESCO Mode.** The SPD owns the asset and is responsible for all capital expenditure, O&M, and performance risk for 25 years.
* **PPA Term:** 25 years from the Commercial Operation Date (COD).

### **2. Key Bidding Information**
* **Bid System:** **Single-Stage, Two-Envelope** (Techno-Commercial Bid & Financial Bid). Bidding is conducted **online** via the ISN-ETS portal.
* **Bid Processing Fee:** **INR 6,000** (non-refundable, inclusive of GST).
* **Earnest Money Deposit (EMD):** **Required.** Amount varies per project (see table in Clause 15). Can be submitted as a **Bank Guarantee (BG), Payment on Order Instrument (POI)** from PFC/REC, or an **Insurance Surety Bond**.
* **Performance Bank Guarantee (PBG):** **Required upon selection.** Amount: **INR 3,375 per kW** of awarded capacity. Can also be submitted as BG, POI, or Surety Bond.
* **Service Charges (to SECI):** **INR 1,350 per kW** + GST, payable in two installments (50% after LoA, 50% before PPA signing).
* **Bid Validity:** 12 months from the bid submission deadline.

### **3. Bidder Eligibility Criteria**
* **Entity Type:** Company, LLP, Registered Partnership, or Proprietorship Firm under Indian law. **A foreign company cannot bid standalone or as a consortium member.**
* **Consortium:** Allowed. Must have a **Lead Member** with **not less than 51% shareholding** in the consortium. All members must have non-zero equity participation.
* **Technical Eligibility:**
* Must use commercially established technology.
* **Solar PV modules and cells must be sourced from manufacturers listed in the MNRE’s Approved List of Models and Manufacturers (ALMM)** lists valid on the date of invoicing.
* **Financial Eligibility (Must meet both):**
* **Net Worth:** Must be equal to or greater than the cumulative requirement for all projects bid for. Value is specified per project in Clause 32.1.
* **Liquidity/Working Capital:** Must be equal to or greater than the cumulative requirement for all projects bid for. Can be demonstrated through financial statements or a confirmed bank line of credit. Value is specified per project in Clause 32.2.
* **Documents:** Audited annual accounts for FY 2024-25 (or provisional accounts as of 7 days prior to bid deadline) with supporting CA certificates.

### **4. Bid Submission & Evaluation Process**
1. **Registration:** Bidders must register on the **ISN-ETS portal** (`https://www.bharat-electronictender.com`) and download the official RfS copy.
2. **Bid Submission (Two Envelopes):**
* **Envelope I (Techno-Commercial):** Contains all eligibility documents, formats, and declarations.
* **Envelope II (Financial):** Contains only the **quoted fixed tariff (INR/kWh)** for each project applied for.
3. **Evaluation:**
* **Step 1:** Only bids with complete documentation (incl. EMD & fee) are opened. SECI evaluates Techno-Commercial eligibility.
* **Step 2:** Financial Bids of only qualified bidders are opened.
4. **Selection & Award:**
* The bidder quoting the **lowest tariff (L1)** for a specific project is declared the **Successful Bidder** for that project.
* **Tie-Breaker (if same L1 tariff):** 1) Higher Net Worth; 2) Higher declared CUF; 3) Draw of lots.
* **No negotiations** on the quoted tariff are permitted.
* **Letter of Award (LoA)** is issued separately for each project.

### **5. Critical Project & Contractual Obligations**
* **Scope of Work:** SPD is solely responsible for design, engineering, supply, installation, grid connectivity approvals, net-metering, testing, commissioning, and 25-year comprehensive O&M.
* **Commissioning Timeline:**
* **Scheduled Commissioning Date (SCD):** 7 months from PPA Effective Date.
* **Maximum Delay with Penalty:** Up to 6 months from SCD (pro-rata PBG encashment).
* **Delay beyond Max Period:** PPA capacity gets reduced to only the commissioned capacity; balance stands terminated.
* **Performance (CUF):**
* Must declare a minimum annual CUF of **15%** at the time of bidding.
* Must maintain generation within **+10% / -15%** of declared CUF for the first 10 years, and **+10% / -20%** thereafter.
* **Penalty for shortfall:** 50% of PPA tariff for the shortfall energy.
* **Shareholding Lock-in:** The Successful Bidder (or consortium members combined) must maintain a **minimum 51% shareholding** in the Project Company/SPV until **1 year after COD**.
* **Jurisdiction:** Exclusive jurisdiction for all matters related to this RfS lies with the **courts at New Delhi, India**.

—-

For more information please see below link:

Summary:

—-

**1. Bidding Process**
– **Bidding Method**: Single Stage Single Envelope (Envelope-1 contains Techno-Commercial Bid & Price Bid)
– **Bidding Type**: Domestic Competitive Bidding
– **Portal**: Bids to be submitted via NTPC eProcurement Portal (https://eprocurentpc.nic.in)
– **Key Dates**: As per eProcurement portal (no specific dates provided in document)

**2. Contract Details**
– **Contract Duration**: 2 months from start date
– **Defects Liability/Warranty**: None (Nil)
– **Scope of Work**: Refer to Section V of bidding documents
– **Order Placement**: Awarded to a single agency; no splitting of quantity permitted

**3. Financial & Commercial Terms**
– **Price Basis**: Firm, with variable rates only for specific items as per Section V
– **Bid Security (EMD)**: ₹1,00,000 (mandatory, to be paid online via GePNIC portal)
– **Tender Fee**: Not applicable
– **GST Treatment**: If GST rate not mentioned, it is assumed inclusive in quoted basic rate. Exempted bidders must provide valid exemption documents.
– **Security Deposit (SD)**: 5% of contract value (deducted as per SCC Clause 26), reduced to 2.5% for Women/SC/ST-owned Micro and Small Enterprises (MSEs)
– **Payment Terms**: As per General Conditions of Contract (GCC), unless specified in Scope of Work (SOW)
– **Liquidated Damages**: As per GCC, unless specified in SOW

**4. Eligibility & Preferences**
– **Qualifying Requirements**: Not applicable
– **Local Supplier Preference**: Only Class-I local suppliers eligible (100% local content requirement)
– **MSE Benefits**: Applicable; purchase preference given to MSEs as per Government Policy. Udyam Registration Certificate required.
– **Integrity Pact & IEMs**: Not applicable

**5. Evaluation & Award**
– **Bid Evaluation**: Lump sum basis
– **Bid Rejection**: NTPC reserves right to reject any/all bids or cancel tender without assigning reason
– **Purchase Preference**: Given to MSEs as per MSME Procurement Policy, 2012

**6. Insurance & Safety**
– **Required Insurances**: Workmen’s Compensation, Comprehensive Automobile, Comprehensive General Liability
– **Safety Compliance**: 2% of amount linked to safety aspects retained from monthly bills, released based on quarterly safety compliance certification

—-

For more information please see below link:

Ed Gunn, VP of revenue at home battery storage and virtual power plant (VPP) specialist Lunar Energy, on the market’s recent past and future potential.

The German government has decided to postpone the tenders for the N-10.1 and N-10.2 offshore […]

MAHAPREIT has issued a tender for a 100MW floating solar project at the Tansa and Modak dams in Thane district, Maharashtra. 

There’s something distinctly meaningful about a company that doesn’t just talk about community values, it puts real resources behind them. That’s exactly what Compu Dynamics, the Chantilly-based data center infrastructure leader, demonstrated last month with its $15,000 donation to the Loudoun First Responders Foundation (LFRF), raised through the company’s 6th Annual Charity Golf Tournament.

In an era when many corporations outsource their philanthropic efforts or remain largely disconnected from the communities in which they operate, Compu Dynamics stands out. Since its founding in 2002, the company has maintained deep roots in northern Virginia, and that commitment extends far beyond the bottom line. This year’s record-breaking fundraising effort reflects more than generosity, it reveals a deliberate strategy to strengthen the very fabric that makes Loudoun County resilient.

What makes this donation particularly compelling is the thought behind it. Compu Dynamics didn’t simply write a check to a random cause. Instead, the company recognized that its success as a regional business is inextricably tied to the people and institutions that sustain the community. First responders, including police, firefighters, and emergency personnel, are the backbone of public safety, and when they face unexpected tragedies or crises, they need immediate support. The LFRF provides exactly that through its 100% pass-through model, ensuring every dollar reaches the families who need it most.

“The Loudoun community relies every day on the courage and compassion of our first responders, and there’s no better way to say thank you than by supporting them through organizations like LFRF,” said Steve Altizer, president and CEO of Compu Dynamics.

He captured this philosophy succinctly: The company views supporting first responders and nurturing the local talent pipeline as inseparable from its own mission to power the digital infrastructure that keeps modern business running. There’s a natural alignment here – a company that builds the invisible backbone of cloud computing understands that visible infrastructure matters too: roads patrolled by police, buildings protected by firefighters, and communities strengthened by all those who answer the call to serve.

“We are incredibly grateful for Compu Dynamics’ generosity and their commitment to Loudoun’s first responder community,” said Tina Johnson, president of the LFRF.

But Compu Dynamics’ commitment to Loudoun extends beyond crisis relief. In the same fundraising effort, the company donated $55,000 to Northern Virginia Community College’s Information and Engineering Technologies programs. This forward-thinking approach tackles a critical regional challenge: preparing the next generation of workers for careers in data center operations and digital infrastructure, precisely the skills employers like Compu Dynamics need and communities need to thrive economically.

In six years, the company’s annual charity golf tournament has evolved into one of the region’s most impactful community events. That consistency matters. Philanthropy that shows up year after year, that grows in impact, that strategically addresses both immediate needs and long-term resilience, sends a signal to other companies and community members: This is what responsible corporate citizenship looks like.

For Loudoun County residents, especially those served by first responders, the message is clear: There are businesses here that understand they’re not separate from the community, they’re part of it. And they’re invested in making it stronger.

To learn more, visit Compu Dynamics.

The post Compu Dynamics’ $15,000 Donation Shows What Local Business Success Means for Loudoun Community appeared first on Data Center POST.

Data centers are the backbone of today’s digital economy. Every second of uptime, every day of project delivery, directly impacts a client’s bottom line and a contractor’s reputation. The financial stakes are undeniable: a 60MW data center project delayed by just one day can incur an opportunity cost of $500,000. Extend that to a week, and you’re looking at millions in lost revenue or competitive ground. For general contractors, such delays aren’t just bad for business; they can severely damage trust and future opportunities.

In this environment, crafting accurate, realistic, and truly achievable construction schedules isn’t merely a best practice; it’s a strategic imperative.

The Inherent Flaws of Legacy Scheduling

For years, tools like Oracle’s Primavera P6 have been the industry standard for large-scale construction scheduling. They offer power and precision, no doubt. But they are also inherently rigid and complex. Building or modifying a schedule in these traditional systems demands specialized training, effectively centralizing control with a small, specialized group of schedulers or planners. They become the gatekeepers of the entire process.

This siloed approach creates significant blind spots. Data center projects are incredibly complex, requiring seamless integration of mechanical, electrical, structural, and IT infrastructure. Coordination challenges are guaranteed. When only a handful of individuals can genuinely contribute to the master schedule, critical insights from superintendents, subcontractors, or field engineers are inevitably missed.

The outcome? Schedules that appear solid on paper but often fail to align with jobsite realities. Overly optimistic sequencing, misjudged dependencies, and underestimated risk factors invariably lead to costly schedule slippage.

Unlocking Efficiency: The Power of Visual and Collaborative Scheduling

Enter the next generation of scheduling tools: visual, cloud-based, and inherently collaborative platforms designed to make the scheduling process faster, more transparent, and, crucially, more inclusive.

Unlike traditional tools confined to desktop software and static Gantt charts, these modern solutions empower teams to dynamically build and iterate schedules. Tasks, dependencies, and milestones are visually mapped, immediately highlighting potential bottlenecks or opportunities to safely accelerate timelines through parallel work.

More critically, their collaborative nature opens the scheduling process to the entire project team, including field engineers, trade partners, project managers, and even clients. Everyone can review and comment on the schedule in real time, identify potential conflicts proactively, and propose alternatives that genuinely improve efficiency. The result is a plan that is not only more accurate but truly optimized.

A Broader Brain Trust for a Superior Schedule

The principle is straightforward and powerful: collective intelligence builds a better plan.

In a data center project, every discipline brings unique, invaluable expertise. The MEP contractor might see chances for concurrent work in electrical and cooling systems. The structural team could pinpoint a sequencing issue impacting crane utilization. The commissioning manager might realize tasks can start earlier based on equipment readiness.

When these diverse perspectives are integrated into the schedule, the plan becomes far more resilient and efficient. Collaborative scheduling tools make this input practical and structured, without sacrificing control. The visual aspect makes it easier for non-schedulers to engage meaningfully. They can visually grasp how their proposed changes impact the overall timeline.

This democratization of the scheduling process cultivates a culture of ownership and accountability. When every team member understands the plan and has contributed to its formation, project alignment improves dramatically. Miscommunications decline, coordination excels, and the risk of costly delays diminishes significantly.

Intelligent Schedule Compression Through Collaboration

Beyond accuracy, visual scheduling enables intelligent schedule compression. In conventional environments, shortening a project’s duration often happens reactively, after a delay or missed milestone. Collaborative planning, however, identifies optimization opportunities from day one.

Consider overlapping workstreams previously assumed to be sequential, a move that can shave days or weeks off a schedule. Adjusting resource allocations or reordering tasks based on real-world input can yield similar gains. The key difference: these are proactive decisions, informed by those on the ground, rather than reactive ones made under duress.

For data center clients, keen to bring capacity online as quickly as possible, these efficiencies translate directly into competitive advantage. Delivering a project even two weeks early can represent millions of dollars in added value.

Transparency Drives Trust

Transparency is another critical, often underestimated, benefit. With all stakeholders working from the same live schedule, there’s no confusion over versions, no endless email threads with outdated attachments, and no surprises when changes occur. Updates are real-time and visible to everyone with access, including the owner.

This level of openness fosters trust, both internally within the contractor’s organization and externally with the client. Owners appreciate clear visibility into progress and potential risks. Project teams benefit from streamlined communication and reduced rework. In the high-stakes, competitive data center market, trust is a powerful differentiator.

Data-Driven, Continuous Improvement

Modern scheduling platforms also generate rich data on project planning and execution. Over time, this data becomes an indispensable tool for benchmarking performance, identifying recurring bottlenecks, and continuously refining future schedules.

For instance, analytics can reveal typical durations for specific data center construction phases, common deviation points, and which sequencing strategies consistently deliver faster results. Armed with this intelligence, contractors can hone their planning models, becoming far more predictive.

In an industry that prioritizes precision and repeatability, the ability to learn from past projects and apply those lessons to new ones is invaluable.

A New Standard for a Digital Era

The data center market is expanding rapidly, fueled by AI, cloud computing, and insatiable data demands. The pressure on contractors to deliver complex projects quickly and reliably will only intensify. Those adopting modern, collaborative scheduling approaches will gain a decisive edge.

By moving beyond static, specialist-driven scheduling to dynamic, inclusive planning, general contractors can achieve:

• Significantly greater accuracy in project forecasts.
• Shorter construction durations through optimized sequencing.
• Higher team engagement and accountability.
• Enhanced transparency and trust with clients.
• Systematic continuous improvement across all projects.

Legacy scheduling tools have served their purpose, but their limitations are increasingly mismatched with the speed and complexity of today’s data center projects. The future of data center delivery lies in processes and tools that are as connected and intelligent as the facilities themselves.

Conclusion

The message for data center builders is unambiguous: planning differently is no longer optional. Visual, collaborative scheduling isn’t just a technological upgrade; it’s a fundamental mindset shift that transforms scheduling into a shared, strategic advantage. When the entire project team can see, understand, and shape the plan, they can build faster, smarter, and with far greater confidence. And in a world where every day of delay can cost half a million dollars, that’s not just progress, it’s significant profit.

# # #

About the Author:

Phil Carpenter is the Chief Marketing Officer of Planera, a construction tech startup revolutionizing project management with its visual, Critical Path Method (CPM)-based scheduling and planning software. For more information, visit www.planera.io.

The post Building Data Centers Faster and Smarter: Visual, Collaborative Scheduling Isn’t Just an Option—It’s a Business Mandate. appeared first on Data Center POST.

At infra/STRUCTURE Summit 2025, industry leaders from Inflect, NTT and NextDC explored how AI is accelerating development timelines, reshaping deal structures, and redrawing the global data center map.

The infra/STRUCTURE Summit 2025, held at The Wynn Las Vegas from October 15–16, 2025 convened the brightest minds in digital infrastructure to explore the seismic shifts underway in the age of artificial intelligence. Among the most forward-looking sessions was “AI Impact on Global Market Expansion Patterns,” a discussion that unpacked how AI is transforming where and how data centers are developed, financed, and operated worldwide.

Moderated by Swapna Subramani, Research Director, IMEA, for Structure Research, the panel featured leading executives including Mike Nguyen, CEO, Inflect; Steve Lim, SVP, Marketing & GTM, NTT Global Data Centers; Craig Scroggie, CEO and Managing Director, NEXTDC. Together, they examined how the explosive demand for AI compute power is pushing developers to rethink long-held assumptions about geography, energy, and risk.

AI Is Rewriting the Rules of Global Expansion

For decades, site selection decisions revolved around a handful of core variables: power cost, connectivity, and proximity to major user populations. But in 2025, those rules are being rewritten by the unprecedented scale of AI workloads.

Regions once considered secondary are suddenly front-runners. Scroggie noted how saturation in markets like Singapore and Hong Kong has forced expansion across Thailand, Indonesia, Malaysia, and India, each now racing to deliver power, land, and permitting capacity fast enough to attract global hyperscalers.

“You can’t build large campuses in Singapore anymore,” Scroggie said. “But throughout Southeast Asia, we’re seeing rapid acceleration as operators balance scale, sustainability, and access to emerging population centers.”

The panelists agreed that energy constraints, not capital, are now the primary limiting factor. “The short term is about finding locations where power exists at scale,” explained Scroggie. “The longer-term challenge is developing new storage and generation models to make that power sustainable.”

Geopolitics and Sovereignty Are Shaping Investment

AI’s global reach has also brought geopolitics and national sovereignty to the forefront of infrastructure strategy.

“We’re living in more challenging times than ever before,” said Nguyen, referencing chip export restrictions and international trade interventions. “AI is no longer just a technological conversation, it’s a matter of national defense and economic competitiveness.”

He noted that ongoing trade restrictions with China are reshaping who gets access to advanced chips and where they can be deployed. “The combination of geopolitical and local legislative pressures determines the future of global trade management,” Nguyen said.

As countries strengthen data sovereignty and privacy laws, regional differentiation is intensifying. “Every geography has a different view,” Nguyen continued. “Some nations are creating frameworks to enable AI and cross-border data sharing, others are locking down their ecosystems entirely.”

Scroggie echoed this, adding that sovereignty-driven strategies are driving a surge in localized buildouts. “We’re seeing more countries push to ensure domestic control of digital assets,” he said. “That’s changing the structure of global supply chains and creating ripple effects that extend well beyond national borders.”

The Industry’s Race Against Time

The conversation turned toward construction velocity, a challenge every developer feels acutely.

“Are we building fast enough?” Subramani, the moderator of the conversation asked.

“Simply put, no,” said Scroggie. “We can’t keep up with demand. Traditional 12-to-24-month build cycles no longer align with AI’s acceleration curve. We have to find a way to build differently.”

The group discussed the need for new modular construction methods, accelerated permitting, and AI-assisted project management to meet scale and speed requirements.

Nguyen framed it within the broader context of industrial history. “We are standing at the dawn of the next industrial revolution,” he said. “Just as steam, electricity, and the internet reshaped economies, AI will redefine global competitiveness. The countries that can deliver sustainable, affordable power will lead.”

He pointed to the “Jacquard Paradox” of AI infrastructure: the more intelligence we produce, the cheaper it becomes, and the more of it the world demands. “The hallmark of global competitiveness will be the unit cost of producing intelligence,” Ngyen explained. “That requires deep collaboration between developers, energy providers, and governments.”

Evolving Deal Structures Reflect a More Complex Market

The financial framework of data center development is also changing dramatically. Traditional “build-to-suit” models are giving way to more creative, multi-tiered partnerships as both hyperscalers and institutional investors seek flexibility and risk mitigation.

“There’s a diversity of players now entering the market, some with deep operational experience, others completely new to the space,” said Scroggie. “Everyone’s chasing the same megawatts, but their risk tolerance and credit profiles vary widely.”

Scroggie also described how education and transparency have become critical. “We’re constantly advising clients on what’s feasible and what’s not. Many are coming in with unrealistic expectations about speed, power, or pricing. It’s part of our job to bridge that gap.”

The consensus was clear: AI-driven demand has transformed data centers from real estate assets into strategic infrastructure platforms, with financial, political, and environmental implications far beyond the industry itself.

Looking Ahead: The Next Decade of AI-Driven Infrastructure

As the discussion drew to a close, the panelists reflected on the extraordinary pace of change. “AI is not replacing, it’s additive,” said Scroggie. “Every new workload, every new inference model adds demand. The scale we’re dealing with is unprecedented.”

In this new era, speed, sustainability, and sovereignty are the defining dimensions of competitiveness. The industry’s success will hinge on its ability to innovate faster than the challenges it faces, whether those are regulatory, environmental, or geopolitical.

“We’re building the highways of the digital era,” said Nguyen in closing. “And like every industrial revolution before it, those who solve the energy equation will lead the world.”

Infra/STRUCTURE 2026: Save the Date

Want to tune in live, receive all presentations, gain access to C-level executives, investors and industry leading research? Then save the date for infra/STRUCTURE 2026 set for October 7-8, 2026 at The Wynn Las Vegas. Pre-Registration for the 2026 event is now open, and you can visit www.infrastructuresummit.io to learn more.

The post How Artificial Intelligence Is Redefining the Future of Global Infrastructure appeared first on Data Center POST.

At this year’s infra/STRUCTURE Summit 2025, held at the Wynn Las Vegas, one of the most forward-looking conversations came from the session “From Cloud to Edge to AI Inferencing.” Moderated by Philbert Shih, Managing Director at Structure Research, the discussion brought together a diverse panel of innovators shaping the future of cloud and AI infrastructure: Kevin Cochrane, Chief Marketing Officer at Vultr; Jeffrey Gregor, General Manager at OVHcloud; and Darrick Horton, CEO at TensorWave.

Together, they explored the emergence of new platforms bridging the gap between hyperscale cloud providers and the next wave of AI-driven, distributed workloads.

The Rise of Alternatives: Choice Beyond the Hyperscalers

Philbert Shih opened the session by emphasizing the growing diversity in the cloud ecosystem, from legacy hyperscalers to specialized, regionally focused providers. The conversation quickly turned to how these companies are filling critical gaps in the market as enterprises look for more flexible, sovereign, and performance-tuned infrastructure for AI workloads.

Cochrane shared insights from a recent survey of over 2,000 CIOs, revealing a striking shift: while just a few years ago nearly all enterprises defaulted to hyperscalers for AI development, only 18% plan to rely on them exclusively today. “We’re witnessing a dramatic change,” Cochrane said. “Organizations are seeking new partners who can deliver performance and expertise without the lock-in or limitations of traditional cloud models.”

Data Sovereignty and Global Reach

Data sovereignty remains a key differentiator, particularly in Europe. “Being European-born gives us a unique advantage,” Gregor noted. “Our customers care deeply about where their data resides, and we’ve built our infrastructure to reflect those values.”

He also highlighted OVHcloud’s focus on sustainability and self-sufficiency, from designing and operating its own servers to pioneering water-cooling technologies across its data centers. “Our mission is to bring the power of the cloud to everyone,” Gregor said. “From startups to the largest public institutions, we’re enabling a wider range of customers to build, train, and deploy AI workloads responsibly.”

AI Infrastructure at Scale

Horton described how next-generation cloud providers are building infrastructure purpose-built for AI, especially large-scale training and inferencing workloads. “We design for the most demanding use cases, foundational model training, and that requires reliability, flexibility, and power optimization at the cluster scale.”

Horton noted that customers are increasingly choosing data center locations based on power availability and sustainability, underscoring how energy strategy is becoming as critical as network performance. TensorWave’s approach, Horton added, is to make that scale accessible without the hyperscale overhead.

Democratizing Access to AI Compute

Across the panel, a common theme emerged: accessibility. Whether through Vultr’s push to simplify AI infrastructure deployment via API-based services, OVHcloud’s distributed “local zone” strategy, or TensorWave’s focus on purpose-built GPU clusters, each company is working to make advanced compute resources more open and flexible for developers, enterprises, and AI innovators.

These alternative cloud providers are not just filling gaps — they’re redefining what cloud infrastructure can look like in an AI-driven era. From sovereign data control to decentralized AI processing, the cloud is evolving into a more diverse, resilient, and performance-oriented ecosystem.

Looking Ahead

As AI reshapes industries, the demand for specialized infrastructure continues to accelerate. Sessions like this one underscored how innovation is no longer confined to the hyperscalers. It’s emerging from agile providers who combine scale with locality, sustainability, and purpose-built design.

Infra/STRUCTURE 2026: Save the Date

Want to tune in live, receive all presentations, gain access to C-level executives, investors and industry leading research? Then save the date for infra/STRUCTURE 2026 set for October 7-8, 2026 at The Wynn Las Vegas. Pre-Registration for the 2026 event is now open, and you can visit www.infrastructuresummit.io to learn more.

The post Alternative Cloud Providers Redefine Scale, Sovereignty, and AI Performance appeared first on Data Center POST.

Summary:

—-

## **1. Overview**
This document is a **bid notice** published on the **Government e-Marketplace (GeM)** portal by the **Solar Energy Corporation of India Limited (SECI)**, under the **Ministry of New and Renewable Energy**. The tender is for the **hiring of consultants** on a **milestone/deliverable-based** contract for a period of **2 years**. The consultants are required in areas such as **Energy, Emerging Technology, Strategy, Program Management, Legal/Policy/Regulatory, Climate Change, and Disaster Management**, as per the detailed scope of work.

—

## **2. Key Dates & Submission Details**
– **Bid End Date/Time**: 19-02-2026, 14:00:00
– **Bid Opening Date/Time**: 19-02-2026, 14:30:00
– **Bid Validity Period**: 180 days from the bid end date
– **Pre-Bid Meeting**: 28-01-2026, 15:00:00 (Venue as per NIT on SECI website)
– **Bid Type**: Two Packet Bid (Technical & Financial)
– **Submission Platform**: GeM Portal

—

## **3. Eligibility Criteria**

### **A. Financial Criteria**
– **Minimum Average Annual Turnover** (last 3 financial years): **₹244 Lakhs** (2.44 Crores).
– **Supporting Documents**: Certified Audited Balance Sheets or CA/CMA certificate.
– **For newer entities**: Average turnover of completed financial years after incorporation shall be considered.

### **B. Experience Criteria**
– **Minimum Past Experience**: **3 years** in providing similar services to **Central/State Government/PSU**.
– **Supporting Documents**: Copies of relevant contracts/orders for each financial year.
– **No relaxation** for MSEs or Startups in experience or turnover criteria.

### **C. General Eligibility**
– Bidder must comply with **GeM General Terms & Conditions (GTC)**.
– **Bid splitting is not allowed**.
– **Integrity & Compliance**: Must adhere to labour laws, MSME policy, and Make in India requirements.

—

## **4. Bid Security (EMD) & Performance Security**

### **A. EMD Details**
– **EMD Amount**: ₹12,20,000
– **Advisory Bank**: YES Bank Limited
– **Exemption**:
– **MSEs** (manufacturers of goods / service providers for services) are **exempted** from EMD.
– **Traders are not eligible** for exemption.
– **EMD must be in favour of**:
**Solar Energy Corporation of India Limited, 6th Floor, Plate-B, NBCC Office Block Tower-2, East Kidwai Nagar, New Delhi-110023**.

### **B. Performance Security (ePBG)**
– **Amount**: 5% of contract value
– **Validity**: 27 months (including 90 days beyond contract period)
– **Advisory Bank**: YES Bank Limited

—

## **5. Evaluation Method**
– **Method**: **Least Cost System (LCS)** – Total value-wise evaluation.
– **Technical Evaluation**:
– **Maximum Marks**: 100
– **Minimum Passing Marks**: 75
– Evaluation based on **attached tender document** (no separate seller document required).
– **Clarifications**: 2 days allowed for technical clarifications during evaluation.

—

## **6. Price Preference & Policies**

### **A. MSE Purchase Preference**
– **Applicable**: Yes
– **Margin of Preference**: **L1 + 15%**
– **Condition**: If L1 is **not an MSE**, but an **MSE service provider** quotes within **L1 + 15%**, **100% order quantity** will be awarded to the MSE bidder **subject to acceptance of L1 price**.
– **Eligibility**: Only **service providers** are eligible for MSE preference in services.

### **B. Make in India (MII) Compliance**
– **Applicable**: Yes
– Bidders must comply with **DPIT’s Public Procurement (Preference to Make in India) Order**.
– **Class-I & Class-II suppliers** must meet local content requirements.

### **C. Land Border Country Restrictions**
– Bidders from countries sharing a land border with India must be **registered with the Competent Authority**.
– **False declaration or non-compliance** will lead to **immediate contract termination** and legal action.

—

## **7. Contract Terms & Conditions**

### **A. General Option Clause**
– Buyer may **increase or decrease contract quantity/duration by up to 25%** at the time of contract issuance.
– After contract issuance, **only an increase of up to 25%** is permitted.
– Bidders are **bound to accept** revised quantity/duration.

### **B. Payment Terms**
– As per attached document: **Payment Terms.pdf**
– Likely milestone/deliverable-based payments.

### **C. Labour Law Compliance**
– Seller must comply with:
– **Four Labour Codes** (when notified and enforced)
– **Existing labour laws** until complete substitution
– Non-compliance constitutes a **breach of contract**.

### **D. Additional Terms & Conditions (ATC)**
– Buyer-specific ATCs are included post-approval.
– **Invalid ATCs include**:
– Mandating physical document submission
– Brand-specific requirements
– Experience from specific organizations only
– Clauses against MSME / Make in India policy
– Tender participation fees
– Reference to external sites/documents
– **Grievance Redressal**: Sellers may raise representations within **4 days** of bid publication via GeM dashboard.

—

For more information please see below link:

Summary:

—-

## **1. Overview**
This document is an **Expression of Interest (EOI)** issued by **Telecommunications Consultants India Ltd. (TCIL)**, a Government of India enterprise under the Ministry of Communications, for the selection of a **backend partner** to develop a **7 MW (7000 kW) rooftop solar power project** for **NALCO** at two locations: **Angul and Damanjodi**. The project includes **Engineering, Procurement, Construction (EPC)** and **5 years of Operation & Maintenance (O&M)**.

The EOI is issued in response to the client’s (**NTPC Vidyut Vyapar Nigam Ltd – NVVN**) tender reference **NVVN/CandM/RE431/2025-26**. The selected partner will work **exclusively with TCIL** on a **back-to-back basis**, meaning TCIL will be the lead bidder to the client, and the partner will execute the work for TCIL.

—

## **2. Key Dates**
– **EOI Issue Date**: 14.01.2026
– **Start Date for Online Bid Submission**: 14.01.2026, 18:00 Hrs
– **Last Date for Online Bid Submission**: 27.01.2026, 12:00 Hrs
– **Technical Bid Opening**: 27.01.2026, 13:00 Hrs
– **Financial Bid Opening**: To be notified later

Bids must be submitted online via the **GePNIC portal (https://www.etenders.gov.in)**.

—

## **3. Eligibility Criteria**
The bidder must satisfy the following conditions:

### **A. General Eligibility**
– Must be a **Class-I or Class-II local supplier** as per **Make in India** policy (DPIT Order).
– Must be an **Indian Registered Company** (under Companies Act 1956/2013), Proprietorship, Partnership, or Government Society.
– Must have a valid **PAN and GST Registration**.
– Must not be **blacklisted/debarred** by any Government/PSU.
– **Consortium bids are not allowed.**

### **B. Financial Criteria**
– **Average Annual Turnover** (last 3 years: 2022-23 to 2024-25):
– Minimum **₹7.5 Crores** (₹6.25 Cr for MSEs & Startups).
– **Net Worth**: Must be positive as on 31.03.2025.
– **Profit Before Tax (PBT)**: Positive in **2 out of the last 3 financial years**.

### **C. Technical & Experience Criteria**
– **Similar Work Experience** in last 7 years:
– **Two similar works** each ≥ ₹7.5 Cr (₹6.25 Cr for MSEs), **OR**
– **One similar work** ≥ ₹10 Cr (₹8.75 Cr for MSEs).
– *Similar work* means design, supply, installation, and commissioning of **grid-connected solar PV plants**.
– Must submit **work orders and completion certificates**.

### **D. Other Requirements**
– **Manufacturer’s Authorization Certificate (MAF)** from OEMs.
– **No-Conviction Certificate**.
– **Integrity Pact** must be signed and submitted.
– **Local office** at project site (or undertaking to open one).
– **PF Registration** proof.
– Compliance with **Indian labour laws** and **MSDE skill development** requirements.

—

## **4. Bid Security (EMD) & Fees**
– **EMD Amount**: ₹5,00,000
– **Forms Accepted**: Demand Draft, Bank Guarantee, FDR, Insurance Surety Bond, Electronic Transfer.
– **Validity**: 150 days.
– **Exemption**: **MSEs and Startups are exempted** from EMD and tender fees (subject to certificate submission).
– **Bank Details**: Provided for NEFT/UPI payments.

—

## **5. Evaluation Process**
– **Two-Part Bid**: Technical (Part-I) and Financial (Part-II).
– **Substantially responsive bids only** will be evaluated.
– **Lowest bid (L1)** will be determined from the **Price Bid Schedule**.
– **NPV-Based Evaluation** for works involving CAPEX + OPEX (O&M).
– **Discount Rate**: 10% per annum for NPV calculation.

—

## **6. Key Contractual & Commercial Terms**

### **A. Payment Terms (Back-to-Back)**
– Payments will be released **only after TCIL receives payment from the client**.
– No advance payment.
– Payment linked to milestones: delivery, commissioning, completion.
– **GST compliance** is mandatory; invoices must be raised as per GST laws.

### **B. Performance Security**
– **10% of contract value**.
– Forms: Bank Guarantee, FDR, Insurance Surety Bond.
– Must be submitted within **15 days** of LOI/PO.

### **C. Price Preference & Make in India**
– **MSEs get price preference** (L1 + 15%).
– **Make in India**: Minimum local content required (Class-I: ≥50%, Class-II: 20–50%).
– **Purchase Preference**: 20% margin for Class-I suppliers.

### **D. Risk & Liability**
– **Risk Purchase Clause**: If the supplier fails, TCIL may get work done through a third party at the supplier’s risk and cost.
– **General Lien/Set-Off**: TCIL can appropriate dues from any payments or security deposits.
– **Termination for Default or Insolvency**.
– **Force Majeure**: Limited to war and earthquake; max 3 months suspension.

### **E. Dispute Resolution**
– **Conciliation and Settlement Mechanism (CSM)** as per Annexure-A.
– **Arbitration** (for contracts ≤ ₹5 Cr) through **India International Arbitration Centre (IIAC)**, New Delhi.
– **Courts at New Delhi** have exclusive jurisdiction.

—

For more information please see below link:

Summary:

—

### **1. PROJECT OVERVIEW**
– **Title:** Pre-Feasibility Study for Supply of 100 MW Round-the-Clock (RTC) Renewable Energy by Setting Up a Combination of Wind and Solar Power Plants for CPCL.
– **Type of Contract:** Service Contract (Non-ARC).
– **Tender System:** Two-Bid System (Part-A: Techno-Commercial, Part-B: Priced Bid).
– **Mode:** Electronic via CPCL E-Tender Portal: [https://cpcletenders.nic.in/](https://cpcletenders.nic.in/).
– **Bid Category:** Domestic Bidding.

—

### **2. KEY DATES & SUBMISSION DETAILS**
– **Tender Download Period:** 14 days from publication.
– **Bid Submission Deadline:** 14 days from publication (as per portal).
– **Pre-Bid Meeting:** Applicable (details not specified in snippet).
– **Techno-Commercial Bid Opening:** 14 days from publication or later.
– **Completion Time:** 10 weeks from issue of FOA/LOA.

—

### **3. ELIGIBILITY & PRE-QUALIFICATION CRITERIA (PQC)**

#### **a) Financial Criteria**
– **Annual Turnover (ATO):** Minimum ₹18 lakhs in any one of the last 3 financial years (2022-23, 2023-24, 2024-25).
– **Net Worth:** Must not be negative for the last audited year (2024-25).
– **Documents Required:** Audited financial statements or CA certificate with UDIN.

#### **b) Technical/Experience Criteria**
– **Similar Work Experience:** Must have executed feasibility assessment involving plant sizing with cumulative installed capacity of at least **500 MW** (combination of Wind and Solar, with/without Energy Storage Systems) in the last 10 years (prior to 31.12.2025).
– **Entity Type:** Public/Private Ltd, LLP, Government/PSU, Section 8 company, or industry chamber in India.
– **Supporting Documents:** Work orders + completion certificates (or email/client confirmation if certificate unavailable).

#### **c) Additional Requirements**
– **PAN Card,** GST Registration, Certificate of Incorporation/Partnership Deed.
– **Power of Attorney** / Board Resolution authorizing signatory.
– **No Joint Bids / Consortiums** allowed.
– **Local Content Requirement:** ≥20% (Class-I & Class-II bidders eligible).

—

### **4. EARNEST MONEY DEPOSIT (EMD)**
– **Amount:** ₹30,000.
– **Exemptions:**
– Micro & Small Enterprises (MSE) with valid **Udyam Registration**.
– Central Public Sector Enterprises (CPSEs).
– **Payment Modes:**
– Online transfer/UPI to CPCL account (SBI CAG Branch, Chennai).
– Bank Guarantee (BG) from scheduled Indian bank (min ₹1 lakh).
– Surety Insurance Bond (Format L) also acceptable.
– **Not Acceptable:** Demand Draft.
– **Submission:** Upload scanned copy with bid; original BG to reach within 7 days of tender opening.

—

### **5. EVALUATION METHODOLOGY: QUALITY & COST-BASED SELECTION (QCBS)**
– **Weightage:** Quality (Technical) = 70%, Price = 30%.
– **Technical Scoring Parameters (Max 100 marks):**
1. **Number of RE Feasibility Studies** (≥100 MW each) in last 10 years: Up to 20 marks.
2. **Cumulative Capacity** of such studies: Up to 20 marks.
3. **Business Presentation:** Before CPCL committee (date intimated with 7-day notice).
– **Minimum Technical Score:** 70/100 required for financial bid opening.
– **Final Score Formula:**

—

### **6. SCOPE OF WORK: PRE-FEASIBILITY STUDY**
– **Objective:** Assess feasibility of 100 MW RTC renewable power (Wind + Solar) in two phases:
– **Phase 1:** 50 MW RTC.
– **Phase 2:** Additional 50 MW RTC.
– **Key Study Areas:**
1. Power demand assessment at CPCL facilities.
2. Regulatory & policy review (Central/Tamil Nadu).
3. Technology configuration & capacity planning (with/without Energy Storage).
4. Business model evaluation (Captive / Group Captive / JV).
5. Cost estimation, financial analysis (IRR, NPV, LCOE/DCOE, sensitivity).
6. Vendor shortlisting for implementation.
– **Deliverables:** Draft report (Week 8), Final report (Week 10).
– **Estimated Contract Value (Incl. GST):** ₹30,00,000.
– **Bidders to Quote:** Percentage over estimated price (lump-sum basis).

—

For more information please see below link:

Summary:

—

### **1. PROJECT OVERVIEW**
– **Title:** Selection of Partner for Procurement of Grid Tie Roof-Mounted Hybrid Solar Photovoltaic Systems (Cumulative 2 MWp) in Rodrigues, Republic of Mauritius.
– **Client’s Tender Reference:** CEB/IFB/2025/10478.
– **Issuing Entity:** TCIL (a Government of India Enterprise under the Department of Telecommunications).
– **Objective:** To select a backend partner to work exclusively with TCIL as the prime bidder for the client’s solar PV tender.

—

### **2. KEY DATES & SUBMISSION DETAILS**
– **EOI Posting Date:** 22/01/2026
– **Last Date for Clarifications:** 29/01/2026, 17:00 Hrs
– **Bid Submission Start:** 05/02/2026, 12:00 Hrs
– **Bid Submission Deadline:** 05/02/2026, 17:00 Hrs
– **Technical Bid Opening:** 05/02/2026, 17:30 Hrs
– **Financial Bid Opening:** To be notified later

**Submission Modes:**
1. **Offline:** CEO, TCIL Mauritius, 10 Darwin Avenue, Quatre Bornes, Mauritius.
2. **Online via Email:** `cointenders@intnet.mu` & `tcil@intnet.mu` (Commercial bid must be password-protected, max file size 5MB).

—

### **3. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA**

#### **a) Local Sourcing & Make in India**
– Only **Class-I and Class-II local suppliers** (as per DPIIT Order) eligible unless global tender.
– Mandatory **Make in India Undertaking** required with local content calculation.

#### **b) Entity Registration**
– Must submit Certificate of Incorporation/Registration/Partnership Deed and address proof.

#### **c) Financial Criteria (Last 3 Years)**
– **Average Annual Turnover:** ≥ MUR 37.62 million (MUR 31.35 million for MSEs & Startups).
– **Net Worth:** Positive.
– **Profit Before Tax (PBT):** In at least 2 out of 3 years.

#### **d) Technical & Project Experience (Last 7 Years)**
– **Option A:** Three similar works each ≥ MUR 50.16 million (MUR 43.89 million for MSEs).
– **Option B:** Two similar works each ≥ MUR 62.7 million (MUR 56.43 million for MSEs).
– **Option C:** One similar work ≥ MUR 87.78 million (MUR 81.51 million for MSEs).

**Additional Experience Requirements:**
– Minimum 2 years’ experience in design, installation, testing & commissioning of ≥200 Grid-Tie Roof-Mounted Solar PV Systems (cumulative 1 MWp).
– At least 20 Grid-Tie/Off-Grid Roof-Mounted Solar Hybrid PV-BESS systems in past 2 years.
– **OEM Capability Requirements:**
– 5+ years manufacturing experience.
– Annual production capacity ≥100 MWp (PV panels, hybrid inverters) and ≥100 MWh (BESS).
– ISO 9001 & ISO 14001 certifications.
– Annual production & sale of ≥5000 mounting structures (last 5 years).
– Wind resistance certification for mounting structures in cyclonic conditions.

#### **e) Tax & Regulatory Compliance**
– Valid TAN/PAN and GST/VAT registration (or undertaking to obtain).

#### **f) Manufacturer’s Authorization Certificate (MAF)**
– Required from OEMs in the name of TCIL. Undertaking acceptable if not available at EOI stage.

#### **g) No Blacklisting**
– Must submit a **No-Conviction Certificate**.

#### **h) Other Undertakings Required**
– Solvency, non-cancellation of past TCIL orders (last 2 years), compliance with Mauritius labour laws, skilled workforce commitment (RPL certification within 2 months), clause-by-clause compliance statement, and genuineness of documents.

#### **i) Consortium Bidding (Allowed, max 3 partners)**
– Lead partner must meet experience criteria and ≥25% of turnover requirement.
– Consortium agreement required, specifying joint & several liability.
– Changes in consortium post-submission not permitted.

—

### **4. BID SECURITY (EMD)**
– **Amount:** MUR 285,000 **OR** INR 500,000.
– **Validity:** 180 days from bid submission deadline.
– **Forms Accepted:** Bank Guarantee (from reputed Indian/Mauritian bank), Banker’s Cheque, or Bank Transfer.
– **Exemption:** MSEs and Startups (with valid certificates) are exempted.

—

For more information please see below link: